Editorji is a popular short video news and information platform based in India. It was founded in 2018 by Vikram Chandra, one of India’s leading journalists, and has risen to prominence in the digital news space in a relatively short span of time. The platform is primarily designed for mobile devices, with applications available for Android and iOS.

ABOUT US:

about us editorji

Latest Video News: Editorji provides the latest news video headlines, latest videos clip from India and the World. Get all breaking news videos on Entertainment, Business, Coronavirus, Elections, Politics and more.

Latest Video News, Breaking News, Bollywood, Political, Sports, Business News | Editorji

+91 11 4035 6666 / info@editorji.com
3rd floor, Plot B, Khasara no 360, Sultanpur, New Delhi, Delhi 110030
<a title="mail to us" href="mailto:info@editorji.com">Send Feedback</a>
<a title="Contact Us" href="mailto:info@editorji.com">Contact Us</a>

REACH US

Contact for any questions, suggestions, comments, feedback or advertisement on Editorji.com, we are always looking forward to hearing from you.

Contact Us for Feedback, Suggestions and Advertising 

Editorji content is better experienced in our app.

The Allahabad High Court has observed that 'oral sex' with a minor does not come under the 'aggravated sexual assault' category in the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences (POCSO) Act.
The court reducing the jail term of a man convicted of sexually assaulting a 10-year-old boy.In the judgment, the court said the crime falls in the 'penetrative sexual assault' category which is punishable under Section 4 of the POCSO Act.
In 2016, a man in Jhansi was booked for having "oral sex" with the 10-year-old boy in exchange for Rs 20. The boy had also been threatened with dire consequences if he told anybody about the incident.
A lower court then sentenced the accused to 10-year jail term. The convict appealed against the sentence in the high court.
The Allahabad High Court partly allowed the appeal and sentenced the convict to seven years in jail instead of 10 years.

Allahabad High Court shocker: Oral sex with a child a ‘lesser’ offence

HC: Oral sex with minor not 'aggravated sexual assault' 

Oral sex with a minor a lesser offence: Allahabad HC
HC reduces jail term of man convicted of oral sex with a boy
HC: Oral sex with minor not&nbsp;'aggravated sexual assault'&nbsp;
Jhansi&nbsp;man convicted of oral sex with 10-yr-old boy for ₹20

The court said oral sex with minor&nbsp;falls in the 'penetrative sexual assault' category which is punishable under Section 4 of the POCSO Act
&nbsp;

The Allahabad High Court has observed that 'oral sex' with a minor does not come under the 'aggravated sexual assault' category in the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences (POCSO) Act.
The court reducing the jail term of a man convicted of sexually assaulting a 10-year-old boy. In the judgment, the court said the crime falls in the 'penetrative sexual assault' category which is punishable under Section 4 of the POCSO Act.
Also watch:&nbsp;<a href="https://www.editorji.com/india-news/supreme-court-quashes-bombay-hc-s-skin-to-skin-contact-judgment-1637228002906" target="_blank">Supreme Court quashes Bombay HC's 'skin-to-skin contact' judgment</a>
In 2016, a man in Jhansi was booked for having "oral sex" with the 10-year-old boy in exchange for Rs 20. The boy had also been threatened with dire consequences if he told anybody about the incident.
A lower court then sentenced the accused to 10-year jail term. The convict appealed against the sentence in the high court.
The Allahabad High Court partly allowed the appeal and sentenced the convict to seven years in jail instead of 10 years.

The Supreme Court on Thursday set aside the Bombay High Court judgment that held that groping a minor's breast without "skin to skin contact" can't be termed as sexual assault.
The top court, which was hearing separate appeals of Attorney General and the National Commission for women, had on January 27 stayed the order which had acquitted a man under the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences (POCSO) Act saying groping a minor's breast without 'skin to skin contact' cannot be termed as sexual assault.
A bench headed by Justice U U Lalit set aside the high court judgement, and said the most important ingredient of constituting sexual assault is sexual intent and not skin-to-skin with the child.
Purpose of the law cannot be to allow the offender to escape the meshes of the law, the apex court said.
The 'skin-to-skin' judgment was passed by the Nagpur bench of Bombay High Court while modifying the order of the Sessions Court which held a 39-year-old man guilty of sexual assault for groping a 12-year-old. 

Supreme Court quashes Bombay HC's 'skin-to-skin contact' judgment

SDC quashes Bombay HC judgment that held that groping a minor's breast without "skin to skin contact" can't be termed as sexual assault

SC quashes Bombay HC's 'skin-to-skin contact' judgment

SC quashes Bombay HC's 'skin-to-skin contact' judgment
Bombay HC ruled no sexual offence&nbsp;if no skin-to-skin&nbsp;contact
Sexual intent and not skin-to-skin with the child more important: SC
Attorney General and NCW&nbsp;had appealed against HC order
Purpose of law cannot be to allow offender to escape: SC on POCSO&nbsp;case
Bombay HC acquitted 39-year-old in sexual assault on minor case
&nbsp;

Sexual assault case:&nbsp;
Purpose of the law cannot be to allow the offender to escape the meshes of the law, the apex court said
&nbsp;

The Supreme Court on Thursday set aside the Bombay High Court judgment that held that groping a minor's breast without <a href="https://www.editorji.com/india-news/denied-elevation-bombay-hc-judge-whose-sexual-assault-verdicts-triggered-debate-resigns-1644570425718" target="_blank">"skin to skin contact" can't be termed as sexual assault</a>.
The top court, which was hearing separate appeals of Attorney General and the National Commission for women, had on January 27 stayed the order which had acquitted a man under the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences (POCSO) Act saying groping a minor's breast without 'skin to skin contact' cannot be termed as sexual assault.
A bench headed by Justice U U Lalit set aside the high court judgement, and said the most important ingredient of constituting sexual assault is sexual intent and not skin-to-skin with the child.
Purpose of the law cannot be to allow the offender to escape the meshes of the law, the apex court said.
The 'skin-to-skin' judgment was passed by the Nagpur bench of Bombay High Court while modifying the order of the Sessions Court which held a 39-year-old man guilty of sexual assault for groping a 12-year-old.

pocso case

Categories